Specify consulting

Turn difficult demand into a commercial system

Specify helps businesses turn difficult customer demand into clearer commercial systems, better specification journeys and reusable capability.

Businesses often know they can deliver more than their storefront can express. The difficulty is turning that knowledge into a journey customers can use, a structure teams can govern and an outcome the business can responsibly offer.

That means two kinds of work: deciding what should exist, and building the parts of it the platform does not do yet.

Consulting is €400 per hour excluding VAT. Scope and estimated hours are agreed before any work begins.

Why this exists

If the platform cannot do it yet, that is a project, not a refusal

The most common reason a business cannot move to a new commerce platform is not price or strategy. It is one missing thing: an integration with the system that actually runs the company, a component their product cannot be sold without, or an ordering process that does not resemble a standard checkout.

This entire site argues that businesses lose good demand by refusing requests before understanding whether they could be met. A platform that turned away a serious customer because of a missing connector would be making exactly that mistake about itself, and would deserve to be told so.

So when the product does not yet do what a business needs:

  1. We scope it as development work, at the same hourly rate as everything else here.
  2. We say plainly whether we can build it, and decline when we cannot do it well.
  3. We agree up front who owns what gets built, who maintains it, and what happens to it if either side walks away.
  4. Where the need turns out to be general rather than specific, it becomes part of the platform and stops being anybody's custom code.

Examples of what that looks like

  • An ERP, PIM or WMS with no existing connector, including systems nobody outside the business has seen
  • A product that has to be visualised before it can be specified or ordered
  • An approval step between a configured specification and a committed order
  • A quotation process the standard flow does not express
  • Catalogue, capability or customer data that has to be migrated before anything else can start

None of this makes Specify an agency, and none of it is a promise that any integration is possible. Some systems have no usable interface, and some components are a larger undertaking than a business expects. Scoping is where that gets established, in writing, before anyone commits.

Development

Building what is missing

Engineering work, scoped and billed by the hour like everything else. This is what an onboarding usually needs when a business is too large or too specific for the product as it stands.

Custom components and visualisation

Interfaces the platform does not ship, for products that cannot be sold from a photograph and a dropdown.

  • Product visualisers and configurable previews
  • Specification interfaces for a particular product family
  • Material, finish and component selectors with real constraints behind them
  • Custom presentation of a configured result before it is committed
  • Accessibility and performance work on anything built

Integrations with systems you already run

Connecting Specify to the software that actually runs the business, including systems with no existing connector.

  • ERP, PIM, WMS and CRM connections
  • Product, price and stock synchronisation
  • Quotation and order handover into existing processes
  • Production and scheduling systems
  • Custom APIs, file-based exchanges and whatever the business actually has

Custom ordering and approval flows

Where the standard path from specification to order does not match how the business sells.

  • Approval steps between a specification and a commitment
  • Quotation, negotiation and revision flows
  • Account-specific pricing and terms handling
  • Multi-party ordering, where the specifier and the buyer differ
  • Handover points between the storefront and a human

Onboarding and migration

Getting a large existing business onto the platform without losing what it already knows.

  • Catalogue and product-data migration
  • Modelling existing capability and constraints into the platform structures
  • Historical enquiry and customer data
  • Parallel running while the old system is still live
  • Training and handover to the team that will operate it

Anything built this way is scoped, estimated and agreed before it starts, and the agreement says who owns it and who maintains it afterwards. That conversation happens first because bespoke software has a cost that continues after the invoice.

Advisory

Working out what should exist

The other half of the work, and usually the half that should happen first. Building the wrong integration correctly is still the wrong integration. These are the problems Specify is built around, and if a request is outside them we will say so rather than take the work.

Enquiry and demand analysis

Understand the difficult customer requests that currently become email chains, phone calls, spreadsheets or silent abandonment.

  • Analyse representative enquiries
  • Identify recurring missing information
  • Separate customer facts, assumptions and unknowns
  • Find the Premature No: requests refused before they were understood
  • Map where high-intent demand disappears
  • Define a better enquiry-handling workflow

Capability modelling

Represent what a business can genuinely deliver, beyond what its catalogue happens to publish.

  • Map materials, dimensions and configurations
  • Separate standard, modified and custom outcomes
  • Record combinations that are not possible
  • Model supplier dependencies and lead-time conditions
  • Define minimum-order and geographic constraints
  • Draft the Capability Map and Constraint Record

Specification-journey design

Design the process through which a customer describes what they actually need.

  • Decide which questions are asked, and in what order
  • Separate required information from optional detail
  • Design progressive clarification instead of one long form
  • Handle uncertainty and acceptable alternatives
  • Remove dead ends, so no route ends in nothing
  • Define when a human has to review

Product and storefront information

Expose the information customers repeatedly need and the site does not currently provide.

  • Missing-information analysis against real enquiries
  • Product-page structure and specification clarity
  • Configuration and delivery explanations
  • Trust, approval and refusal language
  • Comparison content and frequently asked questions
  • Accessibility observations and imagery recommendations

Commercial rules, constraints and authority

Decide how commercial truth is governed: who can promise what, and on what basis.

  • Identify who can approve what, and at which threshold
  • Document the inputs a price depends on
  • Separate a plausible outcome from an approved offer
  • Design review and approval workflows
  • Define the Decision Record structure
  • Improve auditability of commercial commitments

Storefront analysis and improvement

Inspect a commercial experience against a written standard and turn the findings into a sequence somebody can act on.

  • Define the scope of an analysis before it starts
  • Separate correctness problems from hypotheses
  • Prioritise findings against commercial impact
  • Translate observations into an improvement roadmap
  • Prepare implementation briefs
  • Decide what would have to be measured to know it worked

Experiments and commercial improvement

Turn an uncertain recommendation into a test that can come back negative.

  • Write the hypothesis and name the customer problem
  • Choose the metric before the change is built
  • Prepare the copy or experience variants
  • Identify risks and who must approve
  • Set the success and failure criteria in advance
  • Record the result, including when nothing moved

AI-assisted merchant workflows

Work out where AI can responsibly help in commerce and administration, and where it must not decide.

  • Merchant workflow and content-management concepts
  • Capability-update and draft-versus-publish controls
  • Where human review is mandatory
  • Audit history and change accountability
  • Prompt and information architecture
  • The boundary between interpretation and commercial authority

Commerce and product strategy

Decide whether demand-driven commerce is relevant to a business at all, before anyone builds anything.

  • Configurable and custom-product operating models
  • Supplier and production-network strategy
  • Intent-data strategy: what unmet demand is worth capturing
  • Build-versus-buy decisions
  • Pilot definition and implementation sequencing
  • Written commercial product briefs

Several of these overlap in practice. A capability model that nobody can approve against is not finished, and a specification journey built on an unmodelled capability will produce answers the business cannot honour.

Where this usually starts

Sentences we hear at the beginning

If one of these is close to something you have said out loud in the last month, consulting is probably relevant.

  • We would move, but it does not integrate with the system that runs our business.
  • Our product has to be seen before it can be ordered, and no platform component does that.
  • There is an approval step between a specification and an order that standard checkout cannot express.
  • Customers often ask for products we can make but do not publish.
  • Custom requests take several days and pass between three departments.
  • Our configurator creates dead ends and we do not know where.
  • We do not know which information customers are missing.
  • Sales knows what is possible. The website does not.
  • We are considering an AI-assisted buying journey and do not know what the authoritative data layer should be.
  • We need to turn repeated quotation work into something that scales.
  • We need a pilot brief before committing to a larger implementation.

The list is not exhaustive and none of it will match your wording exactly. The common thread is a gap between what a business can actually deliver and what its software lets a customer ask for. If that sounds familiar, a brief is the quickest way to establish whether there is work here worth doing.

Engagement formats

Five ways to work together

  1. Focused advisory session

    One clearly defined question, review or decision. A few hours, usually a single conversation with preparation either side of it. Appropriate when you know what you are asking and need an answer you can act on.

  2. Diagnostic engagement

    Understand the current process before proposing anything: interviews, existing evidence, real enquiries, and where the process actually breaks. Ends in a written problem definition rather than a solution.

  3. Consulting sprint

    Produce one concrete deliverable: a Capability Map, a constraint model, a specification-flow prototype, an improvement roadmap, a pilot brief, an experiment plan or an implementation brief. Scoped to a named artefact, so it is obvious when it is finished.

  4. Implementation and build

    Building the component, the integration, the flow or the migration, against a scope agreed in advance. This is engineering work and it is the format an onboarding usually ends in. The agreement names who owns the result and who maintains it before any code is written.

  5. Ongoing advisory and implementation support

    Recurring help across product, commercial and implementation decisions, for businesses doing the work themselves and wanting someone to argue with. Billed against actual hours, with no retainer minimum.

How this relates to the Request Readiness Sprint

All five are billed the same way, by the hour. The difference is the size of the question, not the rate. Advisory and engineering time cost the same, because pretending otherwise would just push every engagement toward whichever was cheaper.

The Request Readiness Sprint is a defined, fixed engagement that answers one question: is implementing this worth it for your business? It ends in a Pilot Decision Brief. If that is the question you have, take the Sprint, because it is scoped and priced for exactly that and the price is credited if you go on to implement.

Choose general consulting instead when the question is different from the Sprint's, when you already know you want to proceed, or when you need a specific artefact rather than a decision.

How it works

From brief to agreed scope

Five steps. Nothing is billable until the third one is signed, and the first two happen whether or not you go ahead.

  1. 1. Submit a brief

    You describe the business, the problem and the outcome

    The form at the bottom of this page asks what is happening today, where the process breaks down and what should be different afterwards. It takes about ten minutes and it is the same structure we would use in the first conversation anyway.

  2. 2. We review it

    We decide whether this is work we should take

    Two questions: is this within what Specify is genuinely good at, and is there enough information to scope it responsibly. If the answer to either is no, we say so. Submitting a brief is not acceptance of an engagement.

  3. 3. Scope and agreement

    Everything is agreed in writing before work starts

    The objective, the deliverables, who takes part, the estimated hours, the rate, the timeline, what we depend on you for, confidentiality where relevant, who owns the outputs and what they may be used for, and who reviews and approves. Where something is being built, it also says who maintains it afterwards and what happens to it if either side walks away. If the estimate turns out to be wrong, we tell you before the hours are spent, not after.

  4. 4. Work begins

    Interviews, evidence, modelling, prototyping, building

    The mix depends on the engagement. A diagnostic is mostly interviews and reading real enquiries. A consulting sprint is mostly modelling and writing. A build engagement is engineering, with your team involved in review rather than told about it at the end.

  5. 5. Findings become actionable

    Explicit outputs, decisions, open questions and next steps

    You get what was found, what we recommend, what remains unknown, and what we would do next. Open questions are listed as open rather than quietly resolved with an assumption.

Where an engagement reveals a pattern we think should eventually become part of the platform, we record that separately. It is our note about our product, and it never contains your confidential information.

Pricing

Clear hourly pricing

Consulting is billed at €400 per hour, excluding VAT.

Before work begins, Specify provides an agreed scope or working estimate covering the objective, the expected deliverables, the participants and the likely number of hours. You are agreeing to an estimate and a rate, not signing up to an open meter.

Currency and tax

Rates are in euro. €400 per hour is exclusive of VAT, which is applied according to your billing country.

What is billable

Time spent on the engagement, including preparation, workshops, analysis and written work. The scoping conversation before an agreement exists is not billable.

Estimates

Estimated hours are agreed in advance and are an estimate, not a fixed price. If the work is going to exceed the estimate we raise it before the hours are spent.

Expenses

Travel and third-party costs are agreed separately in advance if they arise at all. Most engagements are remote and incur none.

There is no package, no tier and no minimum retainer. The Request Readiness Sprint is the one fixed-scope engagement, and it is priced separately on its own page.

Why we do this

Consulting that informs the platform

Specify consulting is not intended to become an unrelated agency business. It exists because the fastest way to learn what commerce software should do is to solve the problem by hand first, with a real business, under real constraints, and because a platform that can only serve the customers it already fits will not find out what it is missing.

Engagements reveal things a roadmap meeting cannot:

  • Which commercial decisions are hardest to structure
  • Which capability information is repeatedly missing
  • Which integrations businesses actually need, rather than the ones that sound obvious
  • Which components a product category genuinely cannot be sold without
  • Which questions customers consistently struggle to answer
  • Which constraints need clearer representation
A merchant blocked by something the platform does not do
A consulting investigation, and usually a build
Working software for that business
The same requirement arriving from somebody else
A reusable method, component or platform capability
The next business is not blocked by it at all

Some problems are specific to one business. Others reveal capabilities the platform should eventually make reusable. Most engagements will be the first kind, and we would rather say that than imply every piece of consulting quietly becomes software.

This matters commercially and not only philosophically. Custom code written for one business has to be maintained by somebody for as long as that business uses it, and a platform that accumulates enough of it stops being a platform. Deciding early whether something is bespoke or is a candidate to become general is how that is avoided, and it is a conversation we would rather have during scoping than two years later.

Merchant-confidential information stays confidential. Anything that informs the platform is an abstracted pattern, not your data, your pricing or your supplier list. Where an engagement produces something we would want to generalise, we ask first.

You retain the rights to your deliverables and your confidential information as set out in the signed engagement agreement. Nothing on this page changes those terms, and the agreement governs where the two differ.

What we do not claim

Recommendations are not results

Consulting begins with evidence, constraints and a defined commercial question. Recommendations are not presented as measured outcomes, and any expected impact should be tested or verified where practical.

  • We do not promise increased conversion, revenue or reduced cost, because we have no engagement history that would let us predict it honestly.
  • We do not promise shortened lead times. Lead times are a property of your production, not of a document we write.
  • We do not automate production, and nothing in an engagement changes what your factory or your suppliers can do.
  • We do not claim every custom request can be made profitable. Some demand should be declined faster, and saying so is often the more valuable finding.
  • We do not promise statistically reliable experiment results at volumes where statistics do not apply.
  • We do not claim every engagement becomes a platform feature, and no engagement is priced on the assumption that it might.
  • We do not claim we can integrate with any system. Some have no usable interface, and scoping is where that gets established rather than discovered later.
  • We are a small team and do not carry agency delivery capacity. Where a piece of work needs more people than we have, we say so rather than stretching to take it.

The single thing we will commit to is that you will know more about your own commercial process afterwards than you did before, in writing, including the parts that turn out to be inconvenient.

How we think about this

See the thinking before you commission any of it

Specify keeps a catalogue of commercial improvement ideas: the problem each one addresses, how it could be implemented, what could go wrong, and what would have to be measured to know whether it worked. A selection is published, more is shared with customers, and the rest stays internal.

The published entries are a fair sample of how these engagements are approached. If the reasoning looks like the reasoning you want applied to your own catalogue, capability and constraints, that is what a brief starts.

Consulting brief

Outline a consulting brief

Four short screens, about ten minutes. It asks the same things we would ask in a first conversation, which means the conversation can start further along.

  1. The problem
  2. Context
  3. Your details
  4. Confirm

What is the problem?

Start with what is actually happening rather than what you think the solution is. If you already know the solution, say that too.

What brings you to Specify?

Choose as many as apply. This shapes who reads the brief, not what it costs.

What happens today, and where does the process break down? Concrete beats general: one real request that went badly is worth more than a description of the category.

What should be clearer, faster, safer or commercially possible after the engagement?

Start here

Outline a consulting brief

About ten minutes. It asks what is happening today, what should be different, and who would need to be involved. Submitting it is not a commitment, and nothing is billable until a scope is agreed in writing.

If you would rather start with evidence than with a conversation, the Enquiry Audit is free, runs on this site, and gives you something concrete to bring to a brief.